Non-diesel system
Uses a specially formulated hydrocarbon blend (NAF) and does not use diesel.
01 / GEOLOGICAL CONTEXT
Carbonate in Indonesia
Basin stratigraphy & resource distribution
Source shown on poster: Doust, H. & Noble, R. (2008). Petroleum systems of Indonesia. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 25, 103–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.05.007.
02 / WHY CHRONOFLUX
04 KEY POINTSAdvantages
Corrosion & stability
Exhibits lower corrosion, a more stable acid system, and a better safety profile compared with diesel-based acid systems.
Delayed reaction
Delays acid–rock contact through a stable water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion.
Wormhole development
Generates deeper wormholes with lower PVBt, as stated in the source poster.
03 / REPORTED RESULTS
LABORATORY + FIELDPerformance
In Laboratory Scale
Stability, efficiency & corrosion: ChronoFlux demonstrated superior stability, efficiency, and reduced corrosivity compared with conventional HCl acid systems in lab testing.
Wormhole efficiency: Improves wormhole efficiency and enables deeper acid penetration compared to conventional HCl.
Potential improvement: Potentially reducing the skin factor to −4 to −5 or increasing production by 44%.
Potential skin factor−4 to −5
Potential production increase44%
These two figures are presented as potential outcomes in the source, not confirmed pre/post field deltas.
In Field Scale
Post-acidizing production figures reported for two wells using ChronoFlux.
ABG-1429 March 2025
Liquid rate86.4bblpd
Oil rate48.6bopd
Gas rate2.3MMSCFD
Reported percentage*43.75%as shown on poster
* The poster provides this percentage without explicitly naming the measured parameter. No pre-stimulation baseline is supplied.
04 / TEST EVIDENCE
Click a figure to enlarge